Explain the conditions under which statement by the third party could be taken as ‘admission’ under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872.
Find the answer to the mains question only on Legal Bites.

Question: Explain the conditions under which statement by the third party could be taken as ‘admission’ under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. [HPJS 2019]Find the answer to the mains question only on Legal Bites. [Explain the conditions under which statement by the third party could be taken as ‘admission’ under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872.]AnswerUnder the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, a statement made by a third party is generally not considered as an admission because admissions...
Question: Explain the conditions under which statement by the third party could be taken as ‘admission’ under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. [HPJS 2019]
Find the answer to the mains question only on Legal Bites. [Explain the conditions under which statement by the third party could be taken as ‘admission’ under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872.]
Answer
Under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, a statement made by a third party is generally not considered as an admission because admissions are usually restricted to the parties to the proceeding. However, under certain conditions, a statement by a third party can be considered as an admission under Sections 18 to 21 of the Act.
Conditions Where a Third Party’s Statement is Considered as an Admission:
- Statements by Persons Expressly Referred to by a Party in Interest (Section 18): If a party to a case refers to a third party as having authority to make statements on their behalf, the statement of such a person is considered an admission.
- Statements by Agents (Section 18): If a third party is acting as an agent of a party to the case, their statements regarding the subject matter of the dispute are considered admissions.
- Statements by Persons Having a Proprietary or Pecuniary Interest (Section 18): If a third party has a financial or ownership interest in the subject matter of the case and makes a statement while they have that interest, it is considered an admission.
- Statements by Predecessors-in-Title (Section 18): When a party derives their legal title or rights from a previous owner, any statement made by the previous owner regarding the title is considered an admission.
- Statements by Persons in a Joint Interest (Section 18): If multiple persons share a common interest in a subject, a statement made by one person while the joint interest exists is binding on all.
- Statements by Third Parties in Representative Capacity (Section 19): When a third party makes a statement in a representative capacity (such as a trustee, executor, or official in authority), their statement can be considered an admission if it relates to the case.
- Statements by Persons Whose Position a Party has Adopted (Section 20): If a party to the case relies on or adopts a third party's statement as the basis of their claim or defence, that statement becomes an admission.
- Statements by Third Parties Affecting a Party’s Liability (Section 21): If a third party’s statement affects the liability of a party and is made under circumstances where it is against that party’s interest, it may be considered as an admission.
Important Mains Questions Series for Judiciary, APO & University Exams
- Law of Evidence Mains Questions Series Part-I
- Law of Evidence Mains Questions Series Part-II
- Law of Evidence Mains Questions Series Part-III
- Law of Evidence Mains Questions Series Part-IV
- Law of Evidence Mains Questions Series Part-V
- Law of Evidence Mains Questions Series Part-VI
- Law of Evidence Mains Questions Series Part-VII
- Law of Evidence Mains Questions Series Part-VIII
- Law of Evidence Mains Questions Series Part-IX
- Law of Evidence Mains Questions Series Part-X

Mayank Shekhar
Mayank is an alumnus of the prestigious Faculty of Law, Delhi University. Under his leadership, Legal Bites has been researching and developing resources through blogging, educational resources, competitions, and seminars.